DU panel recommends a common entrance test for admission to undergraduate courses


The University of Delhi formed a nine-member panel which recommended that the university organize a common entrance test to ensure “substantial objectivity” in the admissions process. The move comes against the backdrop of a large number of students, especially the percentage students from Kerala, who are admitted to the University of Delhi.

Delhi University last month dismissed allegations of favoritism towards state councils and said it maintains “fairness for all deserving applicants not only from Indian states but also from overseas. “, amid a large number of Kerala State Council students admitted to university in the first cut list.

The panel formed by the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Delhi, Yogesh Singh, recommended that the university organize a common entrance test to ensure “substantial objectivity” in the admissions process, in the midst of a controversy erupting over Kerala Board’s high one hundred percent score.

The committee formed under the chairmanship of Dean (Examinations) DS Rawat was supposed to examine the reasons for the excessive and insufficient admissions to undergraduate courses, study the distribution of admissions to all undergraduate courses by board of directors, suggest alternative strategies for optimal admissions to undergraduate courses. and review OBC admissions with reference to non-creamy diaper status.

The panel analyzed threshold-based admissions data and found that it had the highest number of students in the CBSE Board, followed by the Kerala Board of Higher Secondary Education, Board of School Education, Haryana, ICSE and Board. of Secondary Education Rajasthan.

“The committee believes that as long as undergraduate university admissions are threshold-based, there is no way to avoid fluctuations, sometimes large, to maintain fairness.

“Any effort to standardize the ratings given by various boards may carry the danger of devising a formula that may not be fair on one scale or another,” the report said.

Noting that the standardization of scores from various boards may not withstand the test of legality, if challenged in court, the report states that “neither threshold-based admissions nor admissions by standardization of assigned scores by various boards are only options that respect maximum objectivity in admissions ”.

“… the Committee is of the opinion that admissions can be made through a Common Entrance Test (CET).

“It may be conducted in an appropriate mode by the University through a well-designed internal arrangement or through any external agency depending on operational feasibility and administrative convenience in effect at that time. “, says the report.

The test should be followed by the declaration of the list of candidates eligible for admissions to the various study programs covering all the colleges and departments of the University where the undergraduate courses are held, he said.

Emphasizing that such an exercise will confer “substantial objectivity” on the admissions process, the report says it will provide applicants with a fair opportunity to sit for a single general examination at national level and assess their merit throughout. of their course. to study.

Listing other benefits of the entrance testing system, the report says it will eliminate existing aberrations such as distributing admissions into certain categories above others among applicants from various boards.

This will help to avoid over-admissions into a particular study program and ensure that merit and only merit of a potential candidate will be the only criteria for their admission category.

“The University of Delhi, being a central university, has a cardinal responsibility to ensure absolute equity in admissions to all upper secondary education councils covering various states and Union territories of our country.

“Any exercise that establishes a system of equity between boards of directors will have the potential to send a clear message about the level of objectivity followed by the university in undergraduate admissions,” the report reads. .

The Committee is also of the opinion that the university’s policy on matters relating to undergraduate admissions can be made public well in advance for the information of all concerned.

To subscribe to Mint newsletters

* Enter a valid email address

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint. Download our app now !!


Comments are closed.