The panel recommends a common entrance test by DU for admission to undergraduate courses


New Delhi, December 4 (PTI) A nine-member panel formed by the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Delhi, Yogesh Singh, recommended that the university organize a joint entrance test to ensure “substantial objectivity” in the admissions process, amid an erupting controversy over the high number of one hundred percent of Kerala board scorers having obtained university admission.

The committee’s recommendations will be discussed and deliberated at the Academic Council meeting scheduled for December 10.

The committee formed under the chairmanship of Dean (Examinations) DS Rawat was supposed to examine the reasons for the excessive and insufficient admissions to undergraduate courses, study the distribution of admissions to all undergraduate courses by board of directors, suggest alternative strategies for optimal admissions to undergraduate courses. and review OBC admissions with reference to “Non-Creamy Layer” status.

The committee also noted that gender neutrality is observed in the undergraduate admission process.

Overall, there were 28,892 (61%) admissions of female applicants and 18,413 (39%) admissions of male applicants.

The committee analyzed threshold-based admissions data and found that among the 39 such boards, it had the highest number of students in CBSE (37,767), followed by the Kerala Board of Higher Secondary Education ( 1,890), Board of School Education, Haryana (1,824), ISC (1,606) and the Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan (1,329).

“The committee believes that as long as undergraduate university admissions are threshold-based, there is no way to avoid fluctuations, sometimes large, to maintain fairness,” said the panel in a report.

“Any effort to standardize the ratings given by various boards may carry the danger of devising a formula that might not be fair on one scale or another,” he said.

Noting that the standardization of scores from various boards may not withstand the test of legality, if challenged in court, the report states that “neither threshold-based admissions nor admissions by standardization of assigned scores by various boards are only options that respect maximum objectivity in admissions ”.

“… the committee is of the view that admissions can be done through a Common Entrance Test (CET). It can be done in an appropriate fashion by the university through a well-designed internal arrangement or by any external body based on operational feasibility and administrative convenience that prevailed at that time, ”he said.

The test should be followed by the declaration of a list of candidates eligible for admissions to various degree programs covering all colleges and departments of the university where undergraduate courses are held, according to the report.

Emphasizing that such an exercise will confer “substantial objectivity” on the admissions process, the report says it will provide applicants with a fair opportunity to sit for a single general examination at national level and assess their merit throughout. of their course. to study.

Listing other benefits of the entrance testing system, the report says it will eliminate existing aberrations such as distributing admissions in some categories above others among applicants from various boards.

This will help avoid over-admissions into a particular study program and ensure that merit and sole merit of a potential candidate will be the only criteria for their admission category, according to the report.

“The University of Delhi, being a central university, has a cardinal responsibility to ensure absolute equity in admissions to all upper secondary governing boards covering various states and Union territories of our country,” said he declared.

“Any exercise that establishes a system of equity between boards of directors will have the potential to send a clear message about the level of objectivity followed by the university in undergraduate admissions,” the report reads. .

The committee is also of the opinion that the university’s policy on matters related to undergraduate admissions can be made public well in advance for the information of all concerned.

In its deliberations, the committee also noted that since admissions are based on a threshold, it is difficult to have control over admissions beyond the sanctioned force, as applicants who are eligible within that threshold all have the right to be admitted for a particular course of study.

“Dissuading these potential applicants from their legitimate right of admission into the degree program chosen on the basis of the threshold may not be an appropriate proposition,” the report said.

The committee also noted that in some of the courses admissions have been considerably low over the years, especially in the reserved category of Scheduled Tribes and in Languages.

“The committee felt that applicants can be constructively encouraged to opt for such courses by optimally emphasizing their relevance and qualitative importance,” the report said. PTI SLB ANB ANB

(Disclaimer: this story is auto-generated from a syndicated feed; only the image and title may have been reworked by


Comments are closed.